FirstAlerts

Connecticut man sentenced to 27 months for bank fraud scheme

Vance Ashley, 57, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud.

4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 6:45 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 2, 2026, 6:04 a.m. ETWritten Sep 2, 2026, 7:00 a.m. ET
Developing · checked 1h ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 2, 2026, 7:08 a.m. ET — checked 1h ago.

Vance Ashley, 57, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was to for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, according to the , as reported by FingerLakes1.com. The government alleged that Ashley was recruited to pose as other people and make unauthorized withdrawals from their bank accounts, traveling to bank branches and using other people's identification to make or attempt unauthorized withdrawals. The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 2, 2026, 6:55 a.m. ET

    Connecticut man sentenced to 27 months for bank fraud scheme

    Vance Ashley, 57, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was sentenced on September 2, 2026, to 27 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of New York.

    The government alleged that Ashley was recruited to pose as other people and make unauthorized withdrawals from their bank accounts, and that he traveled to bank branches and used other people's identification to make or attempt unauthorized withdrawals, as reported by FingerLakes1.com.

    The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations.

  2. Sep 2, 2026, 6:52 a.m. ET

    Connecticut man sentenced to 27 months for bank fraud scheme

    Vance Ashley, 57, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of New York, as reported by FingerLakes1.com.

    The government alleged that Ashley was recruited to pose as other people and make unauthorized withdrawals from their bank accounts, and that he traveled to bank branches and used other people's identification to make or attempt unauthorized withdrawals. The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations.

  3. Sep 2, 2026, 6:45 a.m. ETFirst report

    Connecticut man sentenced to 27 months for bank fraud scheme

    Vance Ashley, 57, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, was sentenced to 27 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of New York, as reported by FingerLakes1.com.

    The government alleged that Ashley was recruited to pose as other people and make unauthorized withdrawals from their bank accounts, and that he traveled to bank branches and used other people's identification to make or attempt unauthorized withdrawals. The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations.

    The sentencing was reported by FingerLakes1.com. The date of the sentencing was not specified in the report.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 12 Sept 2026, 10:55current

    First published.

  2. Version 12 Sept 2026, 10:45current

    First published.

  3. Version 12 Sept 2026, 11:00current

    First published.

  4. Version 12 Sept 2026, 10:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.