D'Angelo Hunt Charged in Disappearance of J.M.P.
Federal prosecutors have charged D'Angelo Hunt with second-degree murder and other offenses in connection with the disappearance of J.M.P., according to court documents.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 29, 2026, 4:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 29, 2026, 4:51 p.m. ETFirst report
D'Angelo Hunt Faces Charges in Disappearance of J.M.P.
D'Angelo Hunt is charged with second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, assault, evidence tampering, and use of fire to destroy evidence in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Prosecutors allege Hunt was the last person to see J.M.P. alive and later gave investigators an account contradicted by social media messages. The filing states that in the days after J.M.P. went missing, Hunt asked his brother and another person, "Would you guys ever help me with a murder? Would you guys have my back?" According to the filing, when Isaac Hunt asked what he meant, Hunt responded that he was "trying to figure out what I would do if I would ever roll up a body in a rug or burn it or bag it up."
The case is at the charging stage.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 129 Aug 2026, 20:52current
First published.
- Version 129 Aug 2026, 20:51current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.