Clifton Heights Man Sentenced to 78 Months in Stolen Treasury Check Conspiracy
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania says Alexander Telewoda was sentenced this week over a scheme involving checks stolen from a Philadelphia mail facility; three co-defendants await sentencing in October.
By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 10:47 a.m. ET
Developing
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
Alexander Telewoda, 26, of Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania, was this week to 78 months' incarceration, three years of supervised release, restitution of $10,841,731.83 and forfeiture of $162,144.50 for conspiring with three others to steal and sell thousands of U.S. Treasury checks, according to a press release issued August 14, 2026 by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The office said U.S. Attorney David Metcalf announced the sentence, which was imposed by United States District Judge Joshua D. Wolson.
According to the release, Telewoda was charged by superseding indictment in May 2025 along with co-defendants Saahir Irby, 28, and Tauheed Tucker, 24, both of Philadelphia, and Cory Scott, 26, of Ardmore. All four pleaded guilty this May to conspiracy to steal government funds, theft of government funds, and mail theft.
The release states that between June 2023 and September 2024, Irby and Tucker, then working as U.S. Postal Service mail processing clerks, stole thousands of envelopes containing Treasury checks from mail sorting machines at the USPS Philadelphia Processing and Distribution Center and sold them to Scott and Telewoda, who advertised the checks for resale on the Telegram app and mailed them to buyers around the country. Prosecutors said the checks sold to Scott and Telewoda had a face value exceeding $84 million, and that their customers successfully negotiated approximately $11 million worth of the stolen checks at financial institutions. By the time of his arrest in June 2025, the release says, Telewoda had been tied to stolen Treasury checks with an aggregate face value totaling more than $121 million, including more than $3 million in stolen checks recovered from his home on the day of his arrest.
The case remains open as to the other three defendants. The U.S. Attorney's Office said Irby, Tucker and Scott are scheduled to be in October; Irby faces a maximum possible term of 25 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a $1,000,000 fine, while Tucker and Scott each face a maximum possible sentence of 20 years' imprisonment, three years of supervised release and a $750,000 fine.
The release lists the investigating agencies as the USPS Office of Inspector General, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Homeland Security Investigations, the FBI and the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General, with assistance from the Montgomery County Detective Bureau, the Lower Merion Township Police Department and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Assistant United States Attorney Jessica Rice is prosecuting the case.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.