FirstAlerts

Dominican National Sentenced to 15 Years for Drug Trafficking Conspiracy

Alexander Aguasvivas-Pena was sentenced in federal court for leading a drug organization that distributed methamphetamine in New Hampshire and Massachusetts.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ET
On Aug. 11, 2026, Alexander Aguasvivas-Pena, 32, a citizen of the Dominican Republic unlawfully present in the United States, was to 15 years in prison by U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante, according to official court records from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Hampshire. Aguasvivas-Pena pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. The case remains open as part of broader enforcement efforts. Official records state that law enforcement agencies began investigating a drug-trafficking organization in late 2023 operating in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Investigators used cooperating witnesses and an undercover officer to conduct controlled purchases from members of the organization, which was led by Aguasvivas-Pena and responsible for distributing over 10 kilograms of methamphetamine alongside other drugs. The investigation was led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Major Offender Task Force with assistance from the Drug Enforcement Administration, New Hampshire State Police, Strafford County Sheriff's Office, and Boston Police Department, and was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Yasir Sadat and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Heather Cherniske. Following the sentencing, U.S. Attorney Erin Creegan stated, "Mr. Aguasvivas-Pena led an organization moving huge quantities of illicit narcotics into New Hampshire. He must be held accountable. This sentence imposes that accountability." Ted E. Docks, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Boston Division, said, "Alexander Aguasvivas-Pena and other members of this drug organization pumped huge quantities of methamphetamine and other dangerous drugs into our communities. Today's sentence puts him out of business and behind bars."

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 13:20current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.