FirstAlerts

Eight charged in Oxford attempted murder case

Romario Qatja is accused of attempted murder after an alleged incident on St Clement's, Oxford, and seven others face weapons and public order charges.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 10, 2026, 12:00 a.m. ETWritten Sep 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. ET
Eight people have been in connection with an alleged incident on St Clement's, Oxford, according to thisisoxfordshire.co.uk. The case is at the charging stage and remains undecided. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Romario Qatja, 31, of Pipkin Way, Oxford, is with attempted murder. The government alleges he committed the attempted murder of Rabar Pirot after an alleged incident on St Clement's, thisisoxfordshire.co.uk reported. The matter is undecided and has not been resolved. Samyan Khdir, 21, of Poplar High Street, London, and Eyub Hussani, 25, of Warley Avenue, Dagenham, are alleged to have been spotted with weapons — a sword and a long piece of wood — on the same day, according to thisisoxfordshire.co.uk. The charges include attempted murder, causing serious injury by dangerous driving, affray, wounding with intent, and having an offensive weapon, namely a sword, and having an offensive weapon, namely a long piece of wood. The other defendants are Gabriel Dos Santos, 28, of Richmond Road, Oxford; Arger Poleshi, 20, of no fixed abode; Armanto Tzourtzi, 24, of no fixed abode; Indrit Ndoj, 35, of St Martins Road, Oxford; and Fiqiri Noka, 27, of Mogridge Drive, Oxford, thisisoxfordshire.co.uk reported. The date of the alleged incident has not been established. The case remains undecided.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Sept 2026, 06:13current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.