FirstAlerts
Crime & Courts

Eight Men Charged Over Oxford Attack

Eight men face charges including attempted murder and wounding with intent following an incident in Oxford.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 28, 2026, 12:00 a.m. ETWritten Aug 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m. ET
Eight men have been in connection with an attack in Oxford, according to thisisoxfordshire.co.uk. The charges include attempted murder, causing serious injury by dangerous driving, affray, and wounding with intent. The defendants are Romario Qatja, of Pipkin Way, Oxford; Samyan Khdir, 21, of Poplar High Street, London; Eyub Hussani, 25, of Warley Avenue, Dagenham; Gabriel Dos Santos, 28, of Richmond Road, Oxford; Arger Poleshi, 20, of no fixed abode; Armanto Tzourtzi, 24, of no fixed abode; Indrit Ndoj, 35, of St Martins Road, Oxford; and Fiqiri Noka, 27, of Mogridge Drive, Oxford. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. The men have been but not yet tried. Charges are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. ETFirst report

    Eight Men Charged After Oxford Attack

    Eight men have been charged in connection with an attack in Oxford, according to thisisoxfordshire.co.uk. The charges include attempted murder, causing serious injury by dangerous driving, affray, and wounding with intent.

    The defendants are Romario Qatja, of Pipkin Way, Oxford; Samyan Khdir, 21, of Poplar High Street, London; Eyub Hussani, 25, of Warley Avenue, Dagenham; Gabriel Dos Santos, 28, of Richmond Road, Oxford; Arger Poleshi, 20, of no fixed abode; Armanto Tzourtzi, 24, of no fixed abode; Indrit Ndoj, 35, of St Martins Road, Oxford; and Fiqiri Noka, 27, of Mogridge Drive, Oxford.

    The proceedings are at the charging stage, and the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The date of the alleged incident has not been established from the available information.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 128 Aug 2026, 06:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 128 Aug 2026, 06:25current

    First published.

  3. Version 128 Aug 2026, 07:22

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.