West Virginia man charged with felony drug offense after Elkins traffic stop
William Houdini Johnson, Jr., 42, faces a felony charge of prohibited acts involving a controlled substance; the case is at the charging stage and no trial has been held.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 10, 2026, 12:43 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 10, 2026, 12:52 a.m. ET
Elkins traffic stop leads to felony drug charge against passenger
William Houdini Johnson, Jr., 42, has been charged with prohibited acts involving a controlled substance, a felony, following a traffic stop by the Elkins Police Department, theintermountain.com reported.
The government alleges Johnson, a passenger in a vehicle stopped by Elkins police, possessed a large bag of a white powdery substance consistent with fentanyl, according to theintermountain.com.
The case is at the charging stage. The charge is an allegation and Johnson is presumed innocent. No trial or plea has been reported, and the matter remains undecided.
Sep 10, 2026, 12:43 a.m. ETFirst report
Elkins traffic stop leads to felony drug charge against passenger
William Houdini Johnson, Jr., 42, has been charged with prohibited acts involving a controlled substance, a felony, theintermountain.com reported. The charge is an allegation and the case is at the charging stage; it has not been resolved.
The government alleges Johnson, a passenger in a vehicle stopped by Elkins police, possessed a large bag of a white powdery substance consistent with fentanyl, according to theintermountain.com. The Elkins Police Department is the investigating agency, the outlet reported.
No further outcome has been reported.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Traffic stop leads to felony drug chargetheintermountain.com
Revision history
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:52current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:43current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:57current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.