FirstAlerts

Former D.C. High School Teacher Pleads Guilty to Coercing and Enticing a Minor

John Aaron Gass, 35, admitted to charges stemming from the sexual abuse of a 16-year-old student, according to federal court records.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 8:58 a.m. ET
John Aaron Gass, 35, of Hyattsville, Maryland, a former history teacher at the District of Columbia International School, guilty on August 10, 2026, to Coercion and Enticement of a Minor, according to official court documents announced by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro. The developing case remains open in U.S. District Court, where U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan scheduled sentencing for Dec. 11, 2026. According to court documents, Gass worked as a history teacher at the charter school in Northwest D.C. until November 2025. Beginning in the spring of 2025, Gass began communicating outside of school with a 16-year-old student and met with her on multiple occasions to sexually abuse her, including entering her home through her bedroom window late at night. Court documents state that Gass exchanged sexually explicit images with the victim and used her phone to record videos of the abuse on at least two occasions. Authorities arrested Gass at his Maryland home in December 2025 after the victim disclosed the abuse. The investigation was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington Field Office's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force, with assistance from the Metropolitan Police Department, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Rachel Bohlen under the Department of Justice's Project Safe Childhood initiative.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 12:58current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.