FirstAlerts

Former Immigration Services Officer Charged With Defrauding Union

Carol A. Aguja, 55, of Reading, Mass., was charged with wire fraud and has agreed to plead guilty to stealing more than $60,000 from a labor union, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. The charges are allegations and the defendant is presumed innocent.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 5:05 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 5:24 p.m. ET
BOSTON – A former Immigration Services Officer was and has agreed to plead guilty to stealing more than $60,000 from a labor union over the course of five years, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts. The case is at the charging stage; the details contained in the charging document are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Carol A. Aguja, 55, of Reading, Mass., was with wire fraud. A plea hearing has not yet been scheduled by the Court. The charging document alleges that between 2019 and 2024, Aguja defrauded the American Federation of Government Employees Local 38 (AFGE Local 38) by siphoning funds from the union bank account. As part of the scheme, she is alleged to have used the AFGE Local 38 credit card to pay approximately $12,508 for personal expenses such as restaurant meals, bills, clothing and dance lessons. She is further alleged to have made 128 cash withdrawals totaling over $23,700 from the AFGE Local 38 account, and to have transferred over $25,000 from the AFGE Local 38 account to her personal accounts. Aguja served as Treasurer of AFGE Local 38 between approximately 2015 and August 2024. She was an Immigration Services Officer employed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The charge of wire fraud provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater, restitution, and forfeiture. The case was announced by United States Attorney Leah B. Foley; Jonathan Russo, District Director, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Labor-Management Standards; and Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari, Ph.D., U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kristina E. Barclay of the Public Corruption & Special Prosecutions Unit is prosecuting the case.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 20, 2026, 5:05 p.m. ETFirst report

    Former Immigration Services Officer Charged With Defrauding Union

    BOSTON – On August 20, 2026, a former Immigration Services Officer was charged and has agreed to plead guilty to stealing more than $60,000 from a labor union over the course of up to five years, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts. The charge is only at the charging stage, and the matter is undecided.

    Carol A. Aguja, 55, of Reading, Mass., was charged with wire fraud. A plea hearing has not yet been scheduled by the Court. According to court documents, Aguja was an Immigration Services Officer employed by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Between approximately 2015 and August 2024, Aguja also served as Treasurer of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 38 (AFGE Local 38), a labor organization that represented USCIS employees who lived in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New Hampshire.

    The charging document alleges that, between 2019 and 2024, Aguja defrauded AFGE Local 38 by siphoning funds from the union bank account to pay for her own personal and non-union related expenses. As part of her fraud scheme, Aguja is also alleged to have paid union expenses out of her personal accounts and commingled union and personal funds to conceal her embezzlement. Specifically, Aguja is alleged to have used the AFGE Local 38 credit card to pay approximately $12,508 for personal expenses such as restaurant meals, bills, clothing and dance lessons. She is further alleged to have made 128 cash withdrawals totaling over $23,700 from the AFGE Local 38 account, and to have transferred over $25,000 from the AFGE Local 38 account to her personal accounts. Aguja is alleged to have falsified annual forms regarding the union finances that AFGE Local 38 was required to submit to the United States Department of Labor-Management Standards, in order to conceal her fraud.

    The charge of wire fraud provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater, restitution, and forfeiture. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. United States Attorney Leah B. Foley; Jonathan Russo, District Director, U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Labor-Management Standards; and Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari, Ph.D., U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Kristina E. Barclay of the Public Corruption & Special Prosecutions Unit is prosecuting the case.

    The details contained in the charging document are allegations. The defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in the court of law.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 21:24current

    First published.

  2. Version 120 Aug 2026, 21:05current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.