FirstAlerts
Crime & Courts

Former North Carolina Officer Sentenced to 8–10 Years in 2020 Killing

Carlos Alverto Uribe received a sentence of eight to ten years for second-degree murder in the death of a man who had surrendered.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 9, 2026, 2:52 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 2h ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 9, 2026, 3:11 p.m. ET — checked 2h ago.

Carlos Alverto Uribe, a former police officer, was on September 9, 2026, to eight to ten years in prison, according to whky.com. The sentence was imposed in a case prosecuted by the . Uribe had been charged with second-degree murder. The government alleged that Uribe kicked and shot the victim after the victim had surrendered and was no longer deemed a threat, whky.com reported. The North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation investigated the case. The sentencing concludes the criminal proceedings; the specific date of the underlying incident was not stated in the report.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Sept 2026, 18:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.