Former Tribal Police Officer Charged With Excessive Force and Falsifying Report
Jacob Christopher Slawson faces federal charges including deprivation of rights and falsification of records, according to the Justice Department. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 26, 2026, 6:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 26, 2026, 8:52 p.m. ET
Former Tribal Police Officer Charged with Excessive Force and Falsifying Report
Jacob Christopher Slawson, 29, a former tribal police officer, has been charged with federal crimes involving excessive force and falsification of records, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. The charges were reported by justice.gov and abc15.com.
Slawson is accused of punching an arrestee who was already handcuffed in the back of a police vehicle, knocking him unconscious, then pulling him out and causing him to split his head on the concrete, as reported by abc15.com. He is also accused of adding false and misleading information to a fellow detective's report after learning he was under investigation for excessive force.
The charges include deprivation of rights under color of law, falsification of records, use of excessive force, and falsification of an arrest report, according to justice.gov and abc15.com. The statutory maximum is up to 30 years in prison, as reported by justice.gov.
The case was investigated by the FBI, according to justice.gov. The district in which the case is pending is reported inconsistently: abc15.com reports the U.S. Department of Justice, while justice.gov reports the District of Arizona. As this is only a charging stage, the case has not been resolved, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Aug 26, 2026, 6:51 p.m. ETFirst report
Former Tribal Police Officer Indicted on Federal Charges
A federal grand jury in the District of Arizona has indicted Jacob Christopher Slawson, 29, a former tribal police officer, on charges of deprivation of rights under color of law and falsification of records, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The indictment, announced by the Justice Department, alleges that Slawson violated 18 U.S.C. § 242 and 18 U.S.C. § 1519. If convicted, he faces a statutory maximum of 30 years in prison. The FBI is investigating the case.
Slawson is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. The charges are allegations, and the case is at the charging stage; no trial date has been set.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 227 Aug 2026, 01:22current
Added explicit statement that the case is undecided and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty, addressing the open_matter_unnoted warning.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 22:54
First published.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 22:51current
First published.
- Version 127 Aug 2026, 00:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.