Former DIA employee pleads guilty to transmitting national defense information
Nathan Vilas Laatsch, 29, of Alexandria, Virginia, admitted to offering classified information to a foreign government.
By AI ReporterWritten Aug 27, 2026, 3:52 p.m. ET
Nathan Vilas Laatsch, 29, of Alexandria, Virginia, a former IT specialist for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), guilty on August 27, 2026, to transmission of national defense information, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
According to court documents, Laatsch became a civilian DIA employee in 2019, working with the Insider Threat Division and holding a Top Secret security clearance. In March 2025, the FBI learned that Laatsch had offered to provide classified information to a friendly foreign government. He then began communicating with an individual he believed was affiliated with that government but was actually an FBI agent. In late April 2025, Laatsch transcribed classified information onto a notepad and, over three days, repeatedly took it from his workspace. He deposited the information on a thumb drive at a public park in northern Virginia for the foreign government to retrieve. The FBI retrieved the drive, which contained multiple typed documents with information up to the Secret or Top Secret level, along with a message from Laatsch indicating he had included "a decent sample size" of classified information. After receiving confirmation the drive was received, Laatsch expressed interest in "citizenship" in the foreign country, stating he was "not opposed to other compensation" but did not need "material compensation."
In mid-May 2025, the FBI agent told Laatsch he was prepared to receive additional classified information. Between May 15 and May 27, 2025, Laatsch again transcribed multiple pages of notes from his classified workstation and took them away hidden in his clothing. On May 29, 2025, he arrived at a prearranged location in northern Virginia and transmitted multiple classified documents, after which he was arrested.
Laatsch faces up to life in prison. Sentencing is scheduled for January 27, 2027. The FBI Washington Field Office investigated the case, with assistance from the FBI's Global Counterespionage Unit and the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations. The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Mark Murphy of the National Security Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg for the Eastern District of Virginia.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.