FirstAlerts

Former USDA Program Director Sentenced in $400,000 Fraud Scheme

Kirk Perry, 62, was sentenced to 24 months in prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud in a kickback scheme involving his nephew.

4 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 8:49 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 22, 2026, 4:00 p.m. ETUpdated Aug 31, 2026, 12:23 p.m. ET
Kirk Perry, 62, a former United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) program director, was on August 7, 2026, to 24 months in prison for conspiracy to commit money, property, and honest services wire fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. The sentence was announced by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro. Perry, of Lorain, Ohio, pleaded guilty on April 29, 2025, before U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. His nephew, Jamarea Grant, 32, of Cleveland, Ohio, pleaded guilty on Nov. 27, 2024, to the same charge. According to court documents, from August 2015 through November 2022, Perry arranged for Grant to be hired by two companies under contract with the USDA Office of Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, and they conspired to bill the government for work Grant did not perform. Perry also transferred approximately $125,000 of the USDA payments from Grant's account to his own. In addition to the prison term, Judge Kollar-Kotelly ordered Perry to serve two years of supervised release and to pay restitution of $399,319. Federal prosecutors had requested a prison term of 33 to 41 months. Grant's sentencing is pending. The case was investigated by the USDA Office of Inspector General - Sensitive Investigations Office and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian P. Kelly.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 26, 2026, 8:22 a.m. ET

    Former USDA Program Director Sentenced to 24 Months in $400,000 Fraud Scheme

    Kirk Perry, 62, a former program director at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was sentenced on August 7, 2026, to 24 months in prison for his role in a kickback scheme that billed the government nearly $400,000 for work that was not performed, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.

    Perry pleaded guilty on April 29, 2025, to conspiracy to commit money, property, and honest services wire fraud. His nephew, Jamarea Grant, 32, of Cleveland, Ohio, pleaded guilty to the same charge on Nov. 27, 2024. Grant's sentencing is pending.

    According to court documents, Perry used his position as a senior director within the USDA's Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights to secure employment for Grant as an Equal Opportunity Assistant. They billed the office, and Grant received about $399,319 from the government for work that was not performed. Perry also transferred approximately $125,000 of the payments from Grant's bank account to his own.

    In addition to the prison term, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered Perry to serve two years of supervised release and to pay restitution of $399,319. Federal prosecutors had requested a prison term of 33 to 41 months.

    The case was investigated by the USDA Office of Inspector General - Sensitive Investigations Office and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian P. Kelly.

  2. Aug 26, 2026, 7:52 a.m. ET

    Former USDA Program Director Sentenced to 24 Months in $400,000 Fraud Scheme

    Kirk Perry, 62, a former United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) program director, was sentenced on August 7, 2026, to 24 months in prison for his role in a kickback scheme that billed the government nearly $400,000 for work that was not performed, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.

    Perry, of Lorain, Ohio, pleaded guilty on April 29, 2025, to conspiracy to commit money, property, and honest services wire fraud. His nephew, Jamarea Grant, 32, of Cleveland, Ohio, pleaded guilty on Nov. 27, 2024, to the same charge. According to court documents, Perry used his position as a senior director within the USDA's Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights to secure employment for Grant as an Equal Opportunity Assistant. They billed the office, and Grant received about $399,319 from the government for work not performed.

    In addition to the prison term, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered Perry to serve two years of supervised release and to pay restitution of $399,319. Federal prosecutors had requested restitution and a prison term of 33 to 41 months. Grant's sentencing is pending.

    The case was investigated by the USDA Office of Inspector General - Sensitive Investigations Office and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian P. Kelly.

  3. Aug 20, 2026, 8:49 a.m. ETFirst report

    Former USDA Program Director Sentenced to 24 Months in $400,000 Fraud Scheme

    On August 7, 2026, former United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) program director Kirk Perry, 62, of Lorain, Ohio, was sentenced to 24 months in prison for his role in a kickback scheme, according to official court records from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered Perry to serve two years of supervised release and pay $399,319 in restitution. Federal prosecutors had requested restitution and a prison term of 33 to 41 months. The case remains open and developing as court proceedings continue for a co-defendant.

    According to official records, Perry pleaded guilty on April 29, 2025, to conspiracy to commit money, property, and honest services wire fraud. Official court records state that from August 2015 through November 2022, Perry used his position as a senior director within the USDA's Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights to secure employment for his nephew, Jamarea Grant, 32, of Cleveland, Ohio, as an Equal Opportunity Assistant under two federal contracts. Grant reported directly to Perry, who approved the invoices billing the government $399,319 for work Grant did not perform. Perry also accessed Grant's bank account and transferred approximately $125,000 of the payments to his own account.

    Grant pleaded guilty to the same charge on Nov. 27, 2024, and his sentencing remains pending. Official records also note that Perry engaged in the same scheme with his longtime partner, a cousin by marriage, and a personal acquaintance he previously coached in basketball. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro stated that Perry abused his authority and diverted taxpayer funds for personal gain. Special Agent in Charge Jeldrys Lowry of the USDA Office of Inspector General Sensitive Investigations Office stated that Perry ensured a family member was hired on contracts he oversaw to direct monies to himself. The investigation was conducted by the USDA OIG Sensitive Investigations Office and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian P. Kelly.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 231 Aug 2026, 16:23current

    Updated to reflect the official record from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, including the sentencing date and details.

  2. Version 126 Aug 2026, 11:52current

    First published.

  3. Version 120 Aug 2026, 12:49current

    First published.

  4. Version 126 Aug 2026, 12:22current

    First published.

  5. Version 122 Aug 2026, 20:52

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.