Former Washington man sentenced to 15 years for producing child sexual abuse images
Justin D. Carr, 38, of Renton, was sentenced in U.S. District Court in Seattle on August 24, 2026.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 25, 2026, 1:11 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 26, 2026, 8:22 p.m. ET
Former Washington man sentenced to 15 years for producing child sexual abuse images
Justin D. Carr, 38, who resided in Renton, Washington, was sentenced on August 24, 2026, in U.S. District Court in Seattle to 15 years in prison for production of images of child sexual abuse, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Washington. The sentence will run concurrently with a 15-year state sentence. U.S. District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson also imposed lifetime federal supervised release.
Carr was arrested on May 14, 2024, after images of child sexual abuse were discovered on his phone while he was driving with a witness to Colorado. The witness recognized the child in the images and called 9-1-1. The metadata indicated the images were produced in Renton. The FBI and Renton Police Department investigated.
According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, this sentencing is the final of three: Carr was previously sentenced in King County Superior Court for sexual assault of a child and in Colorado for possession of child pornography. The case was prosecuted as part of Project Safe Childhood.
Aug 25, 2026, 1:11 p.m. ETFirst report
Former Washington man sentenced to 15 years for producing child sexual abuse images
A former King County resident was sentenced on August 24, 2026, in U.S. District Court in Seattle to 15 years in prison for production of images of child sexual abuse, announced First Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Neil Floyd. Justin D. Carr, 38, who resided in Renton, Washington, was arrested on May 14, 2024, after images of child sexual abuse were discovered on his phone while he was driving with a witness to Colorado.
According to records filed in the case, Carr and an adult witness were traveling to Colorado when the witness discovered images on Carr's phone of the molestation of a 4-year-old child that the witness recognized. The witness immediately called 9-1-1 and Carr was arrested. The metadata of the images indicated it was produced in Renton, Washington. The Renton Police Department and the FBI were involved in the investigation.
The August 24, 2026 sentencing is the final of three: he was sentenced to 15 years in King County Superior Court for sexual assault of a child; in Colorado he was sentenced for possession of child pornography; and in Seattle, 15 years for producing the images. U.S. District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson sentenced Carr to lifetime federal supervised release following his prison term. Carr will serve the 15-year federal sentence concurrent with a 15-year state sentence.
The case was prosecuted by Special Assistant United States Attorney Laura Harmon, a Senior King County Deputy Prosecutor specially designated to prosecute child exploitation crimes in federal court. This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Former substitute teacher in Michigan sentenced to decades in prison for child pornmidmichigannow.com
- Former Washington man sentenced to 15 years in prison for images of child sexual abuse - The Daily Chroniclechronline.com
- Cuyahoga Falls man sentenced to life in prison for raping, abusing 5-year-old childcleveland19.com
- Mankato man sentenced to 35 years in prison for production of child sexual abuse materialkeyc.com
- Leesville woman sentenced to life in prison for murder and abuse of young childrenkplctv.com
- Beloit man sentenced to 25 years in prison for sexual crimes against a childwmtv15news.com
- Former U.S. soldier accused of child sexual abuse sentenced to prisonwsbradio.com
Revision history
- Version 44 Sept 2026, 15:22current
Updated to reflect the official record from the U.S. Attorney's Office, which provides the definitive account of the sentencing.
- Version 31 Sept 2026, 22:55
Updated to reflect the official record from the U.S. Attorney's Office, including the sentencing date and details.
- Version 229 Aug 2026, 05:52
Updated to reflect the official record from the U.S. Attorney's Office, removing conflicting details from other sources.
- Version 125 Aug 2026, 17:22
First published.
- Version 125 Aug 2026, 17:11current
First published.
- Version 127 Aug 2026, 00:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.