Fraser Bonar Charged with Sexual Offences at Oxford Brookes University
Fraser Bonar, 30, has been charged with rape, assault by penetration, and sexual assault over alleged incidents at Oxford Brookes University in September 2021. The case is at the charging stage and remains undecided.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 11, 2026, 1:22 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 11, 2026, 1:52 a.m. ET
Fraser Bonar Charged with Rape and Sexual Offences at Oxford Brookes University
Fraser Bonar, 30, of Rushley Way, Reading, has been charged with rape, assault by penetration, and sexual assault, according to This is Oxfordshire.
The charges relate to allegations that he raped a woman at Oxford Brookes University in September 2021, with the alleged offences taking place over two separate encounters.
The government alleges that Bonar committed the offences during encounters at the university. The case is at the charging stage and has not been decided. No trial has taken place, and Bonar is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
The case was reported by This is Oxfordshire.
Sep 11, 2026, 1:22 a.m. ETFirst report
Man charged with rape and sexual offences at Oxford Brookes University
A man has been charged with rape, assault by penetration and sexual assault in connection with alleged offences at Oxford Brookes University, according to This Is Oxfordshire.
The government alleges that Fraser Bonar, 30, of Rushley Way, Reading, raped a woman at the university in September 2021, with the alleged offences taking place over two separate encounters, the outlet reported.
The case is at the charging stage. The charges are allegations and have not been proven in court; Bonar is presumed innocent. The matter is undecided and the investigation is open.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Man charged with university rape says he got 'consent at all stages'thisisoxfordshire.co.uk
Revision history
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 05:52current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 05:22current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 05:53current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.