FirstAlerts

Grand Forks woman charged with stealing more than $250,000 from Crookston rental firms

Cathy Ann LaJesse faces 16 felony counts in Polk County District Court; the case is undecided.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 19, 2026, 12:28 p.m. ETWritten Aug 21, 2026, 5:11 p.m. ET
A Grand Forks woman has been with stealing more than $250,000 from two Crookston rental companies, according to a report by Valley News Live. Cathy Ann LaJesse, 53, of Grand Forks, faces eight counts of felony theft by diverting corporate property and eight counts of felony theft by swindle in , the outlet reported. The government alleges LaJesse stole rent and deposit money from the companies, including failing to pay her own rent while making it appear paid, and recording cash payments that never reached company accounts, according to Valley News Live. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension investigated the case. The charges are allegations, and LaJesse is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The case is at the charging stage and has not been decided by a court.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 21:11current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble β€” all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources β€” accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements β€” and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld β€” a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them β€” and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.