Hillsdale County Sheriff Charged With Obstruction and Misconduct
Scott Hodshire faces charges of obstruction of justice and misconduct in office; he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 1, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 1, 2026, 11:24 a.m. ET
Hillsdale County Sheriff Charged With Obstruction of Justice and Misconduct in Office
Hillsdale County Sheriff Scott Hodshire, 59, has been charged with obstruction of justice and misconduct in office, according to court filings reported by 13abc.com.
The government alleges that Hodshire committed these offenses, as stated in the filings. The case is at the charging stage, and no trial has occurred. Hodshire is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.
Sep 1, 2026, 11:18 a.m. ETFirst report
Hillsdale County Sheriff Faces Criminal Charges
Hillsdale County Sheriff Scott Hodshire, 59, has been charged with obstruction of justice and misconduct in office, according to court filings reported by 13abc.com. The charges were filed as of September 1, 2026.
The government alleges that Hodshire committed these offenses, but the specific details of the allegations have not been disclosed in the available reporting. As the case is at the charging stage, the charges are allegations, and Hodshire is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. The matter remains undecided and has not been resolved.
The investigation is ongoing, and further proceedings will determine the outcome.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:24current
First published.
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:18current
First published.
- Version 11 Sept 2026, 15:27current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.