Two Sentenced in Federal Court for Methamphetamine and Firearms Offenses
Pedro Moreno-Duenas and Marco Carillo received federal prison sentences following an undercover investigation in Kansas City.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 8:52 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 8:52 a.m. ETFirst report
Two Sentenced in Kansas Federal Court for Methamphetamine and Firearms Offenses
On August 7, 2026, official records released by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Kansas announced the sentencing of two Mexican nationals in federal district court.
Pedro Moreno-Duenas, 26, was sentenced to 151 months in prison after pleading guilty to one count of distribution of 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. Marco Carillo, 55, was sentenced to 37 months in prison after pleading guilty to one count of illegal alien in possession of a firearm. Official records identify both defendants as illegal aliens from Mexico.
According to court documents, an undercover agent with the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) arranged a meeting with Moreno-Duenas in Kansas City, Kansas, in January 2025 to purchase methamphetamine. During the encounter, Moreno-Duenas offered to sell firearms, pulled a 9mm pistol from his waistband, and sold it to the agent for $350, stating he could provide methamphetamine at a later time.
In February 2025, Moreno-Duenas negotiated further sales via text message with the undercover agent, quoting $1,800 for a pound of methamphetamine and $200 for fentanyl pills, while also sending an image of a Glock pistol with two magazines for sale. During a subsequent meeting, an associate of Moreno-Duenas delivered a plastic bag containing a crystal substance to the agent. A KBI laboratory report confirmed the package contained approximately 452 grams of pure methamphetamine.
U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas Ryan A. Kriegshauser addressed the sentences in an official statement, noting that individuals entering the country to engage in drug and firearms trafficking pose a serious concern, and stated that federal prosecutors and law enforcement partners remain committed to prosecuting offenders and removing them following the completion of their prison terms.
The cases were investigated by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation and Homeland Security Investigations, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Trent Krug and Taylor Hines.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 12:52current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 12:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.