Joseph Verdone Convicted of First-Degree Murder in Fatal Hit-and-Run
A Chicago man was found guilty of first-degree murder for a hit-and-run that killed a pedestrian on a sidewalk.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 29, 2026, 9:55 a.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 29, 2026, 10:08 a.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 29, 2026, 9:59 a.m. ET
Joseph Verdone Convicted of First-Degree Murder in Fatal Hit-and-Run
Joseph Verdone has been convicted of first-degree murder in the death of 22-year-old Enrique Martinez, according to abc7chicago.com. The conviction was announced on August 29, 2026.
Police said Verdone drove onto a sidewalk and struck Martinez, who died at the scene. The incident occurred in Chicago's West Loop neighborhood.
Sentencing has not yet been scheduled. The conviction is not a sentence.
Aug 29, 2026, 9:55 a.m. ETFirst report
Joseph Verdone Convicted of First-Degree Murder in Fatal Hit-and-Run
Joseph Verdone has been convicted of first-degree murder in connection with the death of 22-year-old Enrique Martinez, according to ABC7 Chicago. The conviction was announced on August 29, 2026.
Police said Verdone drove onto the sidewalk and struck Martinez, who died at the scene. The incident occurred in the West Loop neighborhood of Chicago.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 129 Aug 2026, 13:59current
First published.
- Version 129 Aug 2026, 13:55current
First published.
- Version 129 Aug 2026, 14:05current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.