Kenosha Substitute Teacher Sentenced to Prison for Sexual Messages to Student
Alexander Poyner, 34, was sentenced to two years in prison and three years of extended supervision after pleading guilty to felony contributing to the delinquency of a child.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 23, 2026, 5:14 p.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 23, 2026, 5:39 p.m. ET — checked 54 min ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 23, 2026, 5:14 p.m. ETFirst report
Kenosha Substitute Teacher Sentenced for Sexual Messages to Student
A Kenosha County judge sentenced Alexander Poyner, 34, to two years in prison and three years of extended supervision on August 23, 2026, according to Fox6Now. Poyner had been charged with felony contributing to the delinquency of a child after the government claimed he sent sexual messages to a student.
The case has concluded with the sentencing, and the details of the allegations were reported by Fox6Now.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 123 Aug 2026, 21:14current
First published.
- Version 123 Aug 2026, 21:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.