Kroy Biermann Jr. Charged with Sex Crimes, Including Child Molestation
The 15-year-old son of Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann faces charges including aggravated child molestation and false imprisonment; he has not been tried or convicted.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 3, 2026, 5:47 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 3, 2026, 5:53 p.m. ET
Kroy Biermann Jr. Charged with Sex Crimes Against a Child
Kroy Biermann Jr. has been charged with aggravated child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, aggravated sodomy, three counts of sexual battery against a child under 16, and false imprisonment, according to reports from hawaiinewsnow.com and 12onyourside.com. The charges stem from alleged conduct, but no trial has occurred, and the case is undecided. As with any charge, Biermann is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Sep 3, 2026, 5:47 p.m. ETFirst report
Kroy Biermann Jr. Charged with Additional Sex Crimes
Kroy Biermann Jr. has been charged with aggravated child molestation, aggravated sexual battery, aggravated sodomy, three counts of sexual battery against a child under 16, and false imprisonment, according to a report by 12onyourside.com. The charges were reported on September 3, 2026.
The government alleges that Biermann Jr. committed these offenses. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the charges are allegations, and Biermann Jr. is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
The date of the alleged conduct has not been established in the report.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Son of ‘Real Housewives’ star Kim Zolciak, ex-Falcons player indicted for alleged sexual assaultwrdw.com
- Son of ‘Real Housewives’ star indicted on additional sex charges, including child molestation12onyourside.com
- Son of ‘Real Housewives’ star indicted on additional sex crime charges, including child molestationhawaiinewsnow.com
Revision history
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 21:53current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 21:47current
First published.
- Version 13 Sept 2026, 22:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.