Lakeville Man Sentenced to 78 Months in Feeding Our Future Fraud Scheme
Abdinasir Mahamed Abshir, 34, of Lakeville, Minnesota, was sentenced to 78 months in prison for his role in a $250 million fraud scheme that exploited the Federal Child Nutrition Program.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 4:43 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 27, 2026, 7:52 p.m. ET
Lakeville Man Sentenced to 78 Months in Feeding Our Future Fraud Scheme
Abdinasir Mahamed Abshir, 34, of Lakeville, Minnesota, was sentenced to 78 months in prison on August 18, 2026, for his role in a $250 million fraud scheme that exploited the Federal Child Nutrition Program during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota. He is the 23rd defendant to be sentenced in the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme.
Abshir previously pleaded guilty on March 7, 2025, to charges including wire fraud, obstructing justice, and witness tampering, as reported by wcbm.com and townhall.com. The sentence also reflects his effort to tamper with a cooperating trial witness on February 18, 2025, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel imposed the sentence. The FBI, IRS Criminal Investigation, and U.S. Postal Inspection Service investigated the case. The U.S. Attorney's Office noted that the sentence reflects accountability for both the fraud scheme and the attempt to undermine the judicial process.
In related cases, Hussein Mohamed Farah was sentenced to 20 months in federal prison with two years of supervised release, and Ahmed Sharif Omar-Him was sentenced to 36 months in prison, according to fox9.com. The cause of the fraud scheme has been determined through the criminal proceedings.
Aug 18, 2026, 4:43 p.m. ETFirst report
Lakeville Man Sentenced to 78 Months in $250 Million Fraud Scheme
On August 18, 2026, 34-year-old Abdinasir Mahamed Abshir of Lakeville, Minnesota, was sentenced to 78 months in prison for his role in a $250 million fraud scheme that exploited the Federal Child Nutrition Program during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to court records from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota. Abshir is the 23rd defendant to be sentenced in the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme, which remains an open and developing case.
According to official records, U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel handed down the sentence, which also reflects Abshir's effort to tamper with a cooperating trial witness on February 18, 2025. During the trial of co-defendants in United States v. Aimee Bock and Salim Said, Abshir approached a cooperating witness prior to scheduled testimony. Abshir, who was indicted on September 20, 2022, previously pleaded guilty on March 7, 2025.
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation alongside IRS Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Rebecca E. Kline and Matthew C. Murphy. United States Attorney Daniel N. Rosen said, "Today’s sentence makes clear that justice is not for sale, and those who try to buy their way out of accountability will not succeed. Our office is committed to protecting American taxpayer funds." FBI Minneapolis Field Office Special Agent in Charge Christopher D. Dotson added, "The sentence imposed on Abdinasir Abshir reflects accountability not only for his role in a massive fraud scheme, but also for his deliberate attempt to undermine the integrity of the judicial process."
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Feeding Our Future's 23rd Defendant Sentenced to Prisontownhall.com
- Feeding Our Future's 23rd Defendant Sentenced to Prisonwcbm.com
- Feeding Our Future fraudsters sentenced to prison, ordered to pay restitutionfox9.com
- 3 Men Sentenced to Nearly 13 Years in Prison Over Feeding Our Future Fraud Schemetheepochtimes.com
- https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/lakeville-man-23rd-defendant-be-sentenced-feeding-our-future-fraud-scheme
Revision history
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 18:22current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:43current
First published.
- Version 127 Aug 2026, 23:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.