Lewiston Man Sentenced to 84 Months in Federal Prison for Child Pornography
Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, was sentenced to 84 months in federal prison and ordered onto supervised release for ten years, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Idaho.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.
Earlier reports
Aug 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. ETFirst report
Lewiston Man Sentenced to 84 Months in Federal Prison for Possession of Child Pornography
In a developing case, Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, of Lewiston, Idaho, was sentenced on August 18, 2026, to 84 months in federal prison for possession of child pornography, according to an official announcement from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Idaho. United States District Judge David C. Nye ordered Parris to serve ten years of supervised release following completion of his prison sentence and required him to register as a sex offender. According to official court records, law enforcement received a CyberTip in the fall of 2024 flagging a social media account for transmitting suspected child sexual abuse material. Investigators determined the account belonged to Parris and executed a search warrant at his Lewiston residence. On Parris's phone, law enforcement found numerous videos and photos depicting child sexual abuse material, as well as several conversations in which Parris discussed wanting to see and participate in the violent sexual abuse of young children. U.S. Attorney Bart M. Davis commended the work of the Lewiston Police Department, the Idaho Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, the Moscow Police Department, the Nez Perce County Prosecutor's Office, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Johnson prosecuted the case as part of Project Safe Childhood.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:54current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:44current
First published.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:58
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.