FirstAlerts

Lewiston Man Sentenced to 84 Months in Federal Prison for Child Pornography

Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, received an 84-month prison sentence and 10 years of supervised release, according to official records.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 19, 2026, 10:09 a.m. ET
Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, of Lewiston, Idaho, was to 84 months in federal prison for possession of child pornography, according to official court records announced by U.S. Attorney Bart M. Davis on August 18, 2026. U.S. District Judge David C. Nye ordered Parris to serve 10 years of supervised release following completion of his prison sentence and required him to register as a sex offender. According to court records, law enforcement received a CyberTip in the fall of 2024 flagging a social media account for transmitting suspected child sexual abuse material. Investigators determined the account belonged to Parris and executed a search warrant at his Lewiston residence. On his phone, investigators found photos and videos depicting child sexual abuse material, as well as conversations in which Parris discussed wanting to see and participate in the violent sexual abuse of young children. Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Johnson prosecuted the case under Project Safe Childhood. The investigation involved the Lewiston Police Department, the Idaho Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, the Moscow Police Department, the Nez Perce County Prosecutor's Office, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 18, 2026, 4:54 p.m. ET

    Lewiston Man Sentenced to 84 Months in Federal Prison for Child Pornography

    Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, of Lewiston, Idaho, was sentenced on August 18, 2026, to 84 months in federal prison for possession of child pornography, according to a sentencing announcement issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Idaho and attributed to U.S. Attorney Bart M. Davis.

    United States District Judge David C. Nye ordered that Parris be placed on supervised release for ten years following completion of his prison sentence, the announcement states. Parris will also be required to register as a sex offender because of the conviction.

    According to the court records cited in that announcement, law enforcement received a CyberTip in the fall of 2024 flagging a social media account for transmitting suspected child sexual abuse material. Investigators determined the account belonged to Parris, who was living in Lewiston.

    Officers executed a search warrant at Parris's Lewiston residence and found numerous videos and photos depicting child sexual abuse material on his phone, the records state. They also found several conversations between Parris and others in which Parris discussed wanting to see and participate in the violent sexual abuse of young children.

    Davis commended the work of the Lewiston Police Department, the Idaho Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, the Moscow Police Department, the Nez Perce County Prosecutor's Office, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which led to the charges. Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Johnson prosecuted the case, which was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, the Justice Department initiative launched in May 2006 to combat child sexual exploitation and abuse.

  2. Aug 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. ETFirst report

    Lewiston Man Sentenced to 84 Months in Federal Prison for Possession of Child Pornography

    In a developing case, Wyatt Samuel Parris, 20, of Lewiston, Idaho, was sentenced on August 18, 2026, to 84 months in federal prison for possession of child pornography, according to an official announcement from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Idaho. United States District Judge David C. Nye ordered Parris to serve ten years of supervised release following completion of his prison sentence and required him to register as a sex offender. According to official court records, law enforcement received a CyberTip in the fall of 2024 flagging a social media account for transmitting suspected child sexual abuse material. Investigators determined the account belonged to Parris and executed a search warrant at his Lewiston residence. On Parris's phone, law enforcement found numerous videos and photos depicting child sexual abuse material, as well as several conversations in which Parris discussed wanting to see and participate in the violent sexual abuse of young children. U.S. Attorney Bart M. Davis commended the work of the Lewiston Police Department, the Idaho Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, the Moscow Police Department, the Nez Perce County Prosecutor's Office, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Johnson prosecuted the case as part of Project Safe Childhood.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:54current

    First published.

  2. Version 118 Aug 2026, 20:44current

    First published.

  3. Version 119 Aug 2026, 14:09current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.