FirstAlerts

Alfred B. Conner Charged with Murder in Paulding County Shooting

The 72-year-old defendant faces a murder charge in the death of Logan D. Moss; the case remains pending.

3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 5, 2026, 2:16 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 5, 2026, 1:41 a.m. ETWritten Sep 5, 2026, 2:52 a.m. ET
Alfred B. Conner, 72, has been with murder in the shooting death of Logan D. Moss, according to the . The charge was reported by The VW Independent. The government alleges Conner shot and killed Moss. The Paulding County Sheriff's Office investigated the case. The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; Conner has not been tried or convicted. He is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 5, 2026, 2:23 a.m. ET

    Alfred B. Conner, 72, Charged with Murder in Paulding County Shooting

    Alfred B. Conner, 72, has been charged with murder in the shooting death of Logan D. Moss, according to The VW Independent. The charge was reported on September 5, 2026. Conner has not been tried, and the case remains undecided; he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    The charge was filed by the Paulding County Prosecutor's Office following an investigation by the Paulding County Sheriff's Office. The government alleges that Conner shot and killed Moss. Further details of the allegations have not been reported.

  2. Sep 5, 2026, 2:16 a.m. ETFirst report

    Man, 72, Charged with Murder in Paulding County Shooting

    Alfred B. Conner, 72, has been charged with murder in connection with the death of Logan D. Moss, the Paulding County Prosecutor's Office said. The charge was reported by The VW Independent.

    The government alleges that Conner shot and killed Moss. The Paulding County Sheriff's Office is investigating the case.

    The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. Conner has been charged but not tried; charges are allegations, and he is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The date of the alleged incident has not been established.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 15 Sept 2026, 06:23current

    First published.

  2. Version 15 Sept 2026, 06:16current

    First published.

  3. Version 15 Sept 2026, 06:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.