Jeffrey Alan Plank Charged in Fatal Lindale Hit-and-Run
Jeffrey Alan Plank faces charges in connection with the death of Felix Hernandez Nava; the case has not yet been decided.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 8, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 8, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ETFirst report
Man Charged in Fatal Lindale Hit-and-Run of Bicyclist
A man has been charged in connection with a fatal hit-and-run in Lindale, according to easttexasradio.com. The charge against Jeffrey Alan Plank is failing to stop and render aid resulting in death, the outlet reported.
The government alleges that Plank struck Felix Hernandez Nava with a pickup and fled the scene, and that Nava died at the scene, easttexasradio.com reported. State troopers are investigating the case.
The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. Charges are allegations, and Plank is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Man Charged In Fatal Lindale Hit and Run of Bicyclisteasttexasradio.com
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 12:52current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 12:47current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.