FirstAlerts

Jeffrey Alan Plank Charged in Fatal Lindale Hit-and-Run

Jeffrey Alan Plank faces charges in connection with the death of Felix Hernandez Nava; the case has not yet been decided.

2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 8, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 8, 2026, 6:56 a.m. ETWritten Sep 8, 2026, 8:52 a.m. ET
Jeffrey Alan Plank has been in connection with the death of Felix Hernandez Nava, according to easttexasradio.com. The charge stems from allegations that Plank failed to stop and render aid resulting in death. The matter is only at the charging stage and has not been decided; Plank has not been tried and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Sentencing has not been announced, as the case is ongoing. The government alleges that Plank struck Nava, a bicyclist, with a pickup and fled the scene, and that Nava died at the scene. State troopers investigated the case. Further details of the charge were not provided in the report.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 8, 2026, 8:47 a.m. ETFirst report

    Man Charged in Fatal Lindale Hit-and-Run of Bicyclist

    A man has been charged in connection with a fatal hit-and-run in Lindale, according to easttexasradio.com. The charge against Jeffrey Alan Plank is failing to stop and render aid resulting in death, the outlet reported.

    The government alleges that Plank struck Felix Hernandez Nava with a pickup and fled the scene, and that Nava died at the scene, easttexasradio.com reported. State troopers are investigating the case.

    The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. Charges are allegations, and Plank is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Sept 2026, 12:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 18 Sept 2026, 12:47current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.