FirstAlerts

Man charged with arson in fire outside MP Salma Zahid's home

Roshvin Crofton faces charges in connection with vehicles set on fire outside the Toronto home of Liberal MP Salma Zahid; the case has not been decided.

3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 5, 2026, 3:57 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 4, 2026, 6:35 p.m. ETWritten Sep 5, 2026, 4:06 p.m. ET
Roshvin Crofton has been with arson causing damage to property, mischief over $5,000, and failing to comply with a probation order, according to Medicine Hat News. The charges relate to an incident in which police say Crofton poured fuel on five vehicles and set two on fire outside the home of Liberal MP Salma Zahid in Toronto. The Toronto Police Service announced the charges on Sept. 4, 2026. The case is at the charging stage and has not been decided. Crofton has not been tried, and the matter remains undecided. As with any charge, Crofton is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 5, 2026, 4:01 p.m. ET

    Man charged with arson after vehicles set on fire outside MP Salma Zahid's home

    Roshvin Crofton has been charged with arson causing damage to property, mischief over $5,000, and failing to comply with a probation order, according to the Toronto Police Service as reported by Medicine Hat News.

    Police allege Crofton poured fuel on five vehicles and set two on fire outside the home of Liberal MP Salma Zahid. The charges were announced on September 4, 2026.

    Crofton has not been tried, and the case remains undecided. He is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  2. Sep 5, 2026, 3:57 p.m. ETFirst report

    Man charged with arson after vehicles set on fire outside MP Salma Zahid's home

    A man has been charged after police say he poured fuel on five vehicles and set two on fire outside the home of Liberal MP Salma Zahid in Toronto. The charges were announced on September 4, 2026, according to Medicine Hat News.

    Roshvin Crofton is charged with arson causing damage to property, mischief over $5,000, and failing to comply with a probation order, the outlet reported. The allegations have not been tested in court, and Crofton is presumed innocent.

    The Toronto Police Service is investigating. The case is at the charging stage, and no trial date has been reported.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 15 Sept 2026, 20:01current

    First published.

  2. Version 15 Sept 2026, 19:57current

    First published.

  3. Version 15 Sept 2026, 20:06current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.