FirstAlerts

North Carolina Trooper Charged With First-Degree Murder in Cumberland County Captain's Death

Sgt. Nekime Oxendine was indicted in the March 27 death of Capt. Adam David Bean, according to reports. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved.

2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 9, 2026, 3:24 p.m. ETUpdated Sep 10, 2026, 10:22 p.m. ET
Sgt. Nekime Oxendine, a North Carolina State Highway Patrol trooper, has been with first-degree murder in the death of Cumberland County sheriff's captain Adam David Bean, according to reports from abc11.com, police1.com, wral.com and wwaytv3.com. The charge stems from an incident on March 27 at a home in Hope Mills, according to wwaytv3.com and wral.com. A grand jury indicted Oxendine in Bean's death, police1.com reported. The government alleges Oxendine shot and killed Bean, according to abc11.com, wral.com and wwaytv3.com. The State Bureau of Investigation is investigating, police1.com reported. The matter is at the charging stage and is undecided. Oxendine is but has not yet been tried, and the case has not been resolved. Charges are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 9, 2026, 4:12 p.m. ETFirst report

    Man Charged with First-Degree Murder in Death of North Carolina Trooper

    Nekime Matu Oxendine has been charged with first-degree murder in the death of Capt. Adam Bean, according to abc11.com. The charge was announced on September 9, 2026.

    The government alleges that Oxendine shot and killed Capt. Bean. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; no trial has taken place and no verdict has been reached. Oxendine is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 311 Sept 2026, 02:22current

    Added explicit language that the matter is at the charging stage and is undecided, and that the case has not been resolved, while keeping the existing attribution and the sourced range on the alleged conduct.

  2. Version 29 Sept 2026, 21:27

    Updated to reflect the announced date and clarified the conflict in reporting on the alleged conduct.

  3. Version 19 Sept 2026, 20:22

    First published.

  4. Version 19 Sept 2026, 20:12current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.