Bashawn Morales charged in Airport Square shooting
Morales faces charges including two counts of murder in the Airport Square shooting, according to 13abc.com.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 28, 2026, 12:41 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 28, 2026, 12:41 a.m. ETFirst report
Man charged with murder in Airport Square shooting
Bashawn Morales, 20, has been charged in connection with a shooting incident at Airport Square, according to 13abc.com. The charges include two counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, six counts of felonious assault, one count of tampering with evidence, and multiple weapons charges.
Morales allegedly fired a gun multiple times into a vehicle that Catchings was inside, shooting him, as reported by 13abc.com. The charges are allegations, and Morales is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the case is undecided and ongoing.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 128 Aug 2026, 04:52current
First published.
- Version 128 Aug 2026, 04:41current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.