FirstAlerts

Bashawn Morales charged in Airport Square shooting

Morales faces charges including two counts of murder in the Airport Square shooting, according to 13abc.com.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 28, 2026, 12:41 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 27, 2026, 11:58 p.m. ETWritten Aug 28, 2026, 12:52 a.m. ET
Bashawn Morales, 20, has been in the Airport Square shooting, according to 13abc.com. The charges include two counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, six counts of felonious assault, one count of tampering with evidence, and multiple weapons charges. Morales is accused of firing a gun multiple times into a vehicle that Catchings was inside, shooting him. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved. Morales is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 28, 2026, 12:41 a.m. ETFirst report

    Man charged with murder in Airport Square shooting

    Bashawn Morales, 20, has been charged in connection with a shooting incident at Airport Square, according to 13abc.com. The charges include two counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, six counts of felonious assault, one count of tampering with evidence, and multiple weapons charges.

    Morales allegedly fired a gun multiple times into a vehicle that Catchings was inside, shooting him, as reported by 13abc.com. The charges are allegations, and Morales is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the case is undecided and ongoing.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 128 Aug 2026, 04:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 128 Aug 2026, 04:41current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.