Former Attorney Convicted of Attempted Murder in Toledo Restaurant Shooting
Matthew Exton, 43, was convicted on charges including attempted murder and felonious assault after prosecutors said he tried to shoot his ex-wife in a Toledo restaurant.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 11:57 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 7, 2026, 1:52 a.m. ET
Matthew Exton Convicted of Attempted Murder in Toledo Restaurant Shooting
Matthew Exton, 43, was convicted on charges of attempted murder, two counts of felonious assault, and multiple firearm specifications, according to reports from kgns.tv, 13abc.com, and wsaz.com. The conviction was announced by Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney Julia R. Bates.
Prosecutors said Exton tried to shoot his ex-wife inside a restaurant, but the gun did not go off because the safety was on, as reported by kgns.tv and wsaz.com. According to 13abc.com, Bates said Exton entered Sabira, ordered a drink at the bar to be sent to their table, and spit toward their table as he left. He later returned with a gun and headed directly toward their table, where he tried to shoot his ex-wife.
Sentencing has not yet been scheduled.
Sep 4, 2026, 11:57 p.m. ETFirst report
Man Convicted of Attempted Murder in Toledo Restaurant Shooting
Matthew Exton, 43, has been convicted of attempted murder and two counts of felonious assault, along with multiple firearm specifications, according to 13abc.com. The conviction stems from an incident at a Toledo restaurant, as reported by the Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney Julia R. Bates.
Bates said that Exton entered Sabira, ordered a drink at the bar to be sent to their table, and as he left the restaurant, spit toward their table. He later returned with a gun and headed directly toward their table, where he tried to shoot his ex-wife, according to Bates.
The event occurred on a date that has not been established in the provided facts.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Man convicted of attempted murder after trying to shoot, kill ex-wife in Toledo restaurant13abc.com
- Former attorney convicted of attempted murder after trying to shoot ex-wife in restaurantkgns.tv
- Former attorney convicted of attempted murder after trying to shoot ex-wife in restaurantwsaz.com
- Ohio Lawyer Tried to Shoot Ex-Wife in Restaurant, But Gun Safety Was Ontmz.com
Revision history
- Version 17 Sept 2026, 05:52current
First published.
- Version 15 Sept 2026, 03:57current
First published.
- Version 19 Sept 2026, 15:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.