Derrick McLemore Sentenced to 12 Years for Armed Robbery of Beer
A South Carolina man was sentenced to 12 years in prison after pleading guilty to armed robbery for threatening a store employee over a stolen beer.
4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 6, 2026, 1:45 a.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 6, 2026, 2:10 a.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
Earlier reports
Sep 6, 2026, 2:22 a.m. ET
Derrick McLemore Sentenced to 12 Years for Armed Robbery of Beer
Derrick McLemore was sentenced to 12 years in prison on September 4, 2026, after being convicted of armed robbery, according to ABC Columbia.
Prosecutors said McLemore picked up a 12-pack of Bud Light and attempted to leave a store without paying. When an employee confronted him, he pulled out a 12-inch metal object and threatened to stab the employee, ABC Columbia reported.
The sentence was handed down on the same day the conviction was announced.
Sep 6, 2026, 1:52 a.m. ET
Man Sentenced to 12 Years for Armed Robbery of Beer
Derrick McLemore has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for armed robbery, according to ABC Columbia. The sentence was handed down on September 4, 2026.
McLemore picked up a beer and attempted to leave the store without paying, and when an employee confronted him, he pulled out a 12-inch metal object and threatened to stab the employee, ABC Columbia reported.
Sep 6, 2026, 1:45 a.m. ETFirst report
Man Sentenced to 12 Years for Armed Robbery of Beer
Derrick McLemore has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for armed robbery, according to a report by ABC Columbia. The sentencing was announced on September 4, 2026.
McLemore picked up a beer and attempted to leave a store without paying. When an employee confronted him, he pulled out a 12-inch metal object and threatened to stab the employee, as reported by ABC Columbia.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 06:22current
First published.
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 05:45current
First published.
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 06:24current
First published.
- Version 16 Sept 2026, 05:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.