FirstAlerts

Man sentenced to six years for shooting at FedEx manager in Menomonee Falls

DeAnthony Leflore, 20, was sentenced to six years in prison and five years of extended supervision for shooting at a manager at a FedEx facility.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 23, 2026, 5:20 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 23, 2026, 4:29 p.m. ETWritten Aug 23, 2026, 5:22 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 30 min ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 23, 2026, 6:09 p.m. ET — checked 30 min ago.

DeAnthony Leflore, 20, was on August 23, 2026, to , according to the , as reported by FOX6 News. Leflore had been charged with attempted first-degree intentional homicide, misdemeanor battery, and first-degree recklessly endangering safety. The government alleged that Leflore shot at a manager at the Menomonee Falls FedEx facility after an argument, pointing a gun with a laser sight at her and firing a shot. The sentence was imposed in connection with those charges.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 23, 2026, 5:20 p.m. ETFirst report

    Man sentenced to six years for shooting at FedEx manager in Menomonee Falls

    A 20-year-old man was sentenced on August 23, 2026, to six years in prison and five years of extended supervision for shooting at a manager at a FedEx facility in Menomonee Falls, according to the Waukesha County District Attorney's Office as reported by FOX6 News.

    DeAnthony Leflore was charged with attempted first-degree intentional homicide, misdemeanor battery, and first-degree recklessly endangering safety. The government alleged that Leflore shot at the manager after an argument, pointing a gun with a laser sight at her and firing a shot.

    The case has been resolved with the sentencing; the charges were not specified as having been the subject of a trial, and the sentencing follows the charges as reported.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 123 Aug 2026, 21:20current

    First published.

  2. Version 123 Aug 2026, 21:22current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.