Marienville Man Charged with Strangulation, Assault in Warren County
Andrew A. D'Angelo faces charges including strangulation and terroristic threats, according to the Post-Journal.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 1:16 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 4, 2026, 1:16 a.m. ETFirst report
Marienville Man Charged with Strangulation, Threats in Warren County
Andrew A. D'Angelo, 27, of Marienville, Pa., has been charged in Warren County with second-degree strangulation, third-degree assault, misdemeanor strangulation, simple assault, harassment, and terroristic threats with intent to terrorize another, according to the Post-Journal.
The charges stem from an alleged incident in which D'Angelo is accused of pushing a woman out of bed, throwing a vape at her leg, grabbing her by the neck and jawline, shoving her into a wall and onto the floor, threatening to kill her, and getting a firearm and threatening to kill himself, the Post-Journal reported.
The State Police at Marienville are investigating. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the charges are allegations and D'Angelo is presumed innocent.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Man wanted in Jamestown faces new PA chargespost-journal.com
Revision history
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 05:23current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 05:16current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.