Massachusetts Mayor Indicted by Federal Grand Jury for Pandemic Loan Fraud and Money Laundering
The Mayor of Lawrence, Mass., faces 11 counts of wire fraud and money laundering over alleged misuse of COVID-19 small-business loans; the case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 26, 2026, 2:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 26, 2026, 2:51 p.m. ETFirst report
Massachusetts Mayor Indicted by Federal Grand Jury for Pandemic Loan Fraud and Money Laundering
BOSTON – The Mayor of Lawrence, Mass., has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Boston on charges of pandemic loan fraud and money laundering, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts announced on Aug. 26, 2026. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in court.
Brian A. DePena, 61, was charged in an 11-count indictment unsealed today with four counts of wire fraud and seven counts of money laundering. The indictment alleges that DePena obtained over $1.5 million in COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) for his business, Tenares Tire Services Inc., and used the funds for his mayoral campaign, personal tax debts, and to pay off high-interest mortgages on properties he owned. The charges are allegations, and DePena is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in court.
According to the charging documents, DePena applied for EIDL loans in 2020 and 2021. After receiving a $350,000 increase in August 2021, he allegedly paid $85,000 to the IRS for personal tax debts and transferred $120,000 to a personal account, from which he wrote checks totaling $90,000 to his campaign committee. After a second modification brought the total loan to $1,654,400, he allegedly transferred the entire $1,154,188 deposit to a personal account, used $42,112.96 for his campaign, and paid $883,293 to hard-money lenders. As of Aug. 5, 2026, DePena had made only 16 payments on the loan, with an outstanding principal of approximately $1,654,420.
DePena was previously arrested on Aug. 14, 2026, and will appear in federal court for arraignment at a later date. The announcement was made by U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley, along with officials from the IRS Criminal Investigation, FBI Boston Division, Department of Labor OIG, and the Massachusetts OIG. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kistina E. Barclay and Christine Wichers of the Public Corruption Unit.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 18:52current
First published.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 18:51current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.