FirstAlerts

Minnesota Pool Contractor Sentenced to 60 Months for Defrauding 21 Customers

Charles Ray Workman was sentenced to five years in prison and ordered to pay $1.15 million in restitution for wire fraud.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 4, 2026, 2:25 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 3 min ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 4, 2026, 3:40 p.m. ET — checked 3 min ago.

On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota announced that Charles Ray Workman, 41, of Scott County, was to 60 months in prison for wire fraud. Workman was on September 3, 2026, by U.S. District Judge Michael J. Davis. He pleaded guilty on September 16, 2025. Court documents state that from 2021 through 2022, Workman defrauded 21 customers of Minnesota Crete Pools, LLC, a swimming pool construction company he owned. He marketed pools and installation services, collected down payments, and knew the pools were unlikely to be completed. The scheme netted at least $820,000, and Workman was ordered to pay $1.15 million in restitution. United States Attorney Daniel N. Rosen said, “Workman defrauded hardworking Minnesotans and used those funds to enrich himself. Today’s sentence ensures that he is held accountable for his actions.” FBI Minneapolis Branch Assistant Special Agent in Charge Benni Jonsson added, “Today’s sentence shows there are real consequences for betraying the trust of Minnesotans investing in and improving their homes.” The investigation was conducted by the FBI, the Scott County Sheriff’s Office, the Minnesota Bureau of Apprehension, and the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 14 Sept 2026, 18:25current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.