New Jersey Woman Charged in Alleged Murder-for-Hire Plot Against Philadelphia Police Officer
Jaclyn D. Diiorio of Runnemede faces charges including attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder; prosecutors' accounts of the alleged conduct differ.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 10, 2026, 6:33 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 10, 2026, 6:33 p.m. ETFirst report
New Jersey woman charged in alleged murder-for-hire plot targeting Philadelphia police officer
A Runnemede woman has been charged in an alleged murder-for-hire plot targeting a Philadelphia police officer she dated and his 19-year-old daughter, according to nj1015.com. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the charges are allegations and Diiorio is presumed innocent.
Jaclyn D. Diiorio faces charges of using interstate commerce facilities in the commission of a murder-for-hire, attempted murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and possession of a controlled dangerous substance, nj1015.com reported. The charge of using interstate commerce facilities in the commission of a murder-for-hire carries a statutory maximum of 20 years in prison, according to the outlet.
Prosecutors say Diiorio used Tinder and her cellphone to find a would-be hitman to kill the officer and his daughter, and flashed $500 cash as a downpayment, nj1015.com reported.
The charges are allegations; Diiorio has not been tried, and she is presumed innocent. The date of the alleged conduct has not been established in the available reporting.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 211 Sept 2026, 16:53current
Added the two counts of using interstate commerce facilities in an attempt to commission a murder-for-hire and the tmz.com account of the alleged conduct, presented as a sourced range alongside nj1015.com's account.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 22:37
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 22:33current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.