New Orleans Man Indicted on Federal Methamphetamine Charges
A federal grand jury has charged Dexter Montgomery with three counts of methamphetamine distribution; he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 6:00 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 20, 2026, 6:00 p.m. ETFirst report
New Orleans Resident Indicted on Federal Methamphetamine Charges
A federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana returned a three-count criminal indictment on August 7, 2026, against Dexter Montgomery, age 51, of New Orleans, charging him with federal drug distribution offences. United States Attorney David I. Courcelle announced the indictment on August 10, 2026.
According to official records from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery was indicted on two counts of distribution of 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and one count of distribution of 50 or more grams of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine. An indictment is merely a charging document containing allegations, and Montgomery is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
If convicted on the methamphetamine distribution counts, Montgomery faces a mandatory minimum of 10 years and up to life in prison, a fine of up to $10,000,000.00, at least five years of supervised release, and a mandatory $100.00 special assessment fee. The count involving a mixture of methamphetamine carries a potential penalty of five to 40 years in prison, at least four years of supervised release, and a mandatory $100.00 special assessment fee.
Official records state that the investigation was conducted by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Hancock County Sheriff’s Office. Assistant United States Attorney André Jones of the Narcotics Unit is prosecuting the case.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:06current
First published.
- Version 120 Aug 2026, 22:00current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.