FirstAlerts

Newport News man sentenced to 12 years for bank robbery

A Virginia man was sentenced to 12 years and three months in prison for bank robbery and firearm charges.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 8, 2026, 3:36 p.m. ET
Developing · not yet checked for updates

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

A Newport News man was on September 8, 2026, to 12 years and three months in prison for bank robbery with a dangerous weapon and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Court documents state that on October 29, 2025, Curtis A. Robertson, 39, entered a bank in Newport News and waited in line with a newspaper. When he reached the teller, he placed the newspaper on the counter, partially concealing a firearm, with the barrel visible and pointed at the teller. He passed a note demanding money, and the teller complied. Robertson fled with the funds, leaving the note behind, and discarded the newspaper and hoodie in nearby dumpsters. On November 4, 2025, Robertson again entered a Newport News bank and passed a teller a note demanding money. After sightings of a suspicious person running through backyards, a witness identified Robertson from photo surveillance. He was arrested on November 6, 2025. The announcement was made by Theophani K. Stamos, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, and Dominique Evans, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Norfolk Field Office, after sentencing by U.S. District Judge Mark S. Davis. The Newport News Police Department assisted in the investigation, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian J. Samuels prosecuted the case.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Sept 2026, 19:36current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.