NYC Parks Worker Charged, Case Undecided, in Staten Island Firework Injury
Joshua Moe faces endangerment charges after an unlit M-80 firecracker exploded in a park. The case has not been resolved.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 17, 2026, 6:53 a.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 17, 2026, 10:39 p.m. ET — checked 10h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 17, 2026, 7:42 a.m. ET
NYC Parks Worker Charged After Staten Island Fireworks Incident
Joshua Moe, 24, a New York City Parks Department employee, has been charged with child endangerment and reckless endangerment, nbcnewyork.com reported. The case remains at the charging stage and is undecided; charges are allegations and the accused is presumed innocent. The exact date of the incident has not been established.
Police and witnesses allege that Moe, while on duty at General Douglas MacArthur Park in Midland Beach, Staten Island, handed a lighter to a 10-year-old girl who had found an unlit M-80 firecracker after other adults refused her, according to nbcnewyork.com. The firework exploded, costing the girl fingers on her left hand.
The incident is being investigated by the NYPD and the NYC Parks disciplinary unit, nbcnewyork.com reported.
Aug 17, 2026, 6:53 a.m. ETFirst report
NYC Parks Worker Charged After Staten Island Fireworks Incident
A New York City Parks Department employee faces charges after a 10-year-old girl lost fingers on her left hand in a playground explosion, according to reporting by NBC New York. The exact date of the incident has not been established, and the case remains open and developing.
Police and witnesses allege that Joshua Moe, a 24-year-old Parks Department employee on duty at General Douglas MacArthur Park in Midland Beach, Staten Island, handed a lighter to the 10-year-old girl after she found an unlit M-80 firecracker and other adults had refused her request. The firecracker subsequently exploded, NBC New York reported.
Joshua Moe has been charged with child endangerment and reckless endangerment, according to NBC New York. The matter is at the charging stage and remains undecided; charges are allegations and the accused is presumed innocent. The NYPD and the NYC Parks disciplinary unit are investigating the matter.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 117 Aug 2026, 11:42current
First published.
- Version 117 Aug 2026, 10:53current
First published.
- Version 117 Aug 2026, 12:23current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.