OnlyFans Creator Kylie Perez Sentenced to One Year in Prison for Tax Charges
Perez, who appeared on OnlyFans as "Natalie Monroe," was sentenced to a year in prison plus a year of supervised release after the government alleged she failed to pay at least $1.5 million in taxes.
2 reports on this incident · first at Sep 10, 2026, 12:23 a.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 10, 2026, 12:40 a.m. ET — checked 37 min ago.
Earlier reports
Sep 10, 2026, 12:23 a.m. ETFirst report
OnlyFans creator Kylie Perez sentenced to one year in prison for tax evasion
Kylie Perez, 31, who is known as "Natalie Monroe" on OnlyFans, has been sentenced to one year in prison followed by one year of supervised release, Us Weekly reported. The charge was failing to pay taxes on earnings, according to the outlet.
The government claims Perez was not honest about her income on her 2019 tax return and refused to pay at least $1.5 million in taxes owed from 2020 to 2023, Us Weekly reported. The Internal Revenue Service's criminal investigation division was involved in the case, according to the outlet.
The proceeding has reached the sentencing stage, Us Weekly reported.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:23current
First published.
- Version 110 Sept 2026, 04:27current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.