FirstAlerts

Operator of Sham Produce Companies Sentenced to Federal Prison for Cocaine Importation and Money Laundering

Carlos Salazar-Garcia received a ten-year sentence for using sham companies to import cocaine and launder proceeds, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 3, 2026, 10:31 a.m. ET
Developing · not yet checked for updates

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

ATLANTA – Carlos Salazar-Garcia, 37, of Atlanta, was to ten years in federal prison followed by five years of supervised release for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, cocaine importation, and money laundering, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia announced on September 3, 2026. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Salazar-Garcia used sham produce companies to import cocaine concealed in fruit and electronics shipments. In December 2022, federal agents in Laredo, Texas, found 119 pounds of cocaine hidden among electronic transformers destined for a farmers market in Clayton County, Georgia. In November 2023, agents in McAllen, Texas, intercepted approximately 66 pounds of cocaine concealed in a shipment of limes destined for another sham produce company operated by Salazar-Garcia. The investigation also found that Salazar-Garcia and co-defendant Andrea Principe laundered over a million dollars in drug proceeds to Mexico. Salazar-Garcia pleaded guilty on April 20, 2026. Andrea Principe, 37, of Stone Mountain, Georgia, pleaded guilty on June 30, 2026, to conspiracy to commit money laundering and is scheduled for sentencing on October 15, 2026. The case was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations and the Drug Enforcement Administration, with assistance from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Dwayne A. Brown Jr. and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Amy Palumbo.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 13 Sept 2026, 14:31current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.