FirstAlerts

Orlando Business Owner Sentenced to Six Years in Federal Prison for Firearm Possession

An Orlando business owner was sentenced on August 12, 2026, to six years in federal prison following a joint federal and county investigation, according to court records.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 9:34 a.m. ET
On August 12, 2026, Maxwell David Horvath, 37, of Orlando, was to six years in federal prison for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, according to court records from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida. U.S. District Judge Gregory A. Presnell imposed the sentence and ordered Horvath to forfeit 38 firearms—including silencers, short-barreled rifles, machineguns, and automatic firearms—along with thousands of rounds of ammunition. U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe announced the sentence, following Horvath's guilty plea on March 4, 2026. According to court documents, Horvath established a business in Palm Bay named Overseas Organix, Inc. following a federal conviction in January 2019 for possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. In June 2025, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office launched an investigation into the business for marketing and selling products containing 7-OH, a Schedule I controlled substance in Florida. Law enforcement made two undercover purchases at Overseas Organix, Inc. prior to conducting a search of the premises. During the search on December 3, 2025, officers found 38 firearms, including handguns, rifles, shotguns, silencers, machine guns, automatic firearms, and short-barreled rifles, as well as thousands of rounds of ammunition, according to official records. Officers also seized over 91,000 pounds of kratom, kilogram quantities of 7-OH powder, and thousands of pressed 7-OH pills ready for sale. The case was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office, and was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephanie A. McNeff.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 13:34current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.