FirstAlerts
Crime & Courts

Minnesota Man Sentenced to 20 Years for Armed Career Criminal Possession of Ammunition

Esau Chucky Sago, 36, was sentenced to 240 months in prison and five years of supervised release for being an armed career criminal in possession of ammunition.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 4, 2026, 6:26 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 30h ago

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We last searched for new coverage of this at Sep 4, 2026, 3:09 p.m. ET — checked 30h ago.

MINNEAPOLIS – On September 4, 2026, U.S. Attorney Daniel N. Rosen announced that Esau Chucky Sago, 36, was to 240 months in prison and five years of supervised release for being an armed career in possession of ammunition. The sentence was handed down by U.S. District Judge Nancy E. Brasel on September 3, 2026, following a jury conviction on November 18, 2025. According to court documents, on October 10, 2024, Sago possessed ammunition despite prior felony convictions that prohibited him from doing so. His prior offenses include two convictions for domestic assault and one for domestic assault-strangulation, which qualified him as an armed career . He also had convictions for fleeing police, threats of violence, and vehicle theft. The case stemmed from a police pursuit that began when New Hope police officers attempted to stop a white SUV with obstructed license plates and a suspicious paint job. Sago, the driver, led officers from Crystal and Robbinsdale on a high-speed chase exceeding 70 miles per hour through residential areas. The pursuit ended when a Crystal officer performed a PIT maneuver, causing the SUV to spin out and land on a fence in Minneapolis. After Sago's arrest, officers found a loaded "ghost gun" on the fence. The Minnesota Bureau of Apprehension found Sago's DNA on the firearm. U.S. Attorney Daniel N. Rosen said, "The defendant is a danger to not only the community, but his conduct also placed law enforcement officers' lives at risk. Today's sentence protects public safety and ensures he is held accountable for his actions." Acting Special Agent in Charge Matthew Olson of the ATF St. Paul Field Division added, "Mr. Sago had an extensive history of violence well before the police pursuit that ultimately led to his conviction, and today's significant sentence... His repeated violent conduct has demonstrated that he poses a serious threat to public safety."

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 14 Sept 2026, 22:26current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.