FirstAlerts

SEC Charges Former Bank of America Investment Banker and Another with Insider Trading

The SEC has charged Jason Satsky and Gavin Wolfe with insider trading, according to a report from WSAU. The case is at the charging stage and remains undecided.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 21, 2026, 4:27 p.m. ETWritten Aug 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. ET
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has Jason Satsky and Gavin Wolfe with insider trading, according to a report from WSAU. The charges were announced on August 21, 2026. The SEC's investigation is ongoing, and the charges are allegations. The matter is only at the charging stage and has not been decided by a court. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m. ETFirst report

    SEC Charges Former Bank of America Investment Banker and Another with Insider Trading

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged Jason Satsky and Gavin Wolfe with insider trading, according to a report by WSAU News. The charges were announced on August 21, 2026.

    The SEC's investigation is ongoing, and the charges are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven otherwise. The case is only at the charging stage and has not been decided by a court.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 20:52current

    First published.

  2. Version 121 Aug 2026, 20:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.