Hawaiʻi Couple Sentenced in Tax Refund Fraud Conspiracy
Beverly Braumuller-Hawver and Scott Hawver of ʻEwa Beach were sentenced after pleading guilty to charges in a nationwide scheme, according to mauinow.com.
4 reports on this incident · first at Sep 4, 2026, 4:26 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 10, 2026, 10:49 p.m. ET
Hawaiʻi Couple Sentenced in Tax Refund Fraud Conspiracy
Beverly Braumuller-Hawver and Scott Hawver of ʻEwa Beach, Hawaiʻi, were sentenced on September 3, 2026, in the District of Hawaiʻi for their roles in a nationwide tax refund fraud conspiracy, according to mauinow.com. Braumuller-Hawver was sentenced to 16 months in prison and Hawver to 24 months, and the two were jointly and severally ordered to pay $182,438.37 in restitution, the outlet reported.
The charges were conspiring to defraud the IRS, filing a false tax return, and money laundering, mauinow.com reported. The government alleged the two paid a promoter for fraudulent tax paperwork, filed an amended 2014 tax return with a fabricated IRS Form 1099-MISC falsely claiming a mortgage company paid Hawver $749,163 in income and withheld $424,163, prompting the IRS to issue a $192,845 refund they were not entitled to, then moved the money through shell bank accounts and sent frivolous correspondence and filings to thwart collection, according to mauinow.com.
IRS Criminal Investigation investigated the case, mauinow.com reported. The prosecuting offices were the National Fraud Enforcement Division and the USAO for the District of Idaho, according to an official record.
Sep 10, 2026, 10:44 p.m. ET
Hawaiʻi Couple Sentenced in Nationwide Tax Refund Fraud Conspiracy
Beverly Braumuller-Hawver and Scott Hawver, both of ʻEwa Beach, Hawaiʻi, were sentenced on September 3, 2026, in the District of Hawaiʻi for their roles in a nationwide tax refund fraud conspiracy, according to mauinow.com. Braumuller-Hawver was sentenced to 16 months in prison and Hawver to 24 months in prison, and the two were jointly and severally ordered to pay $182,438.37 in restitution, the outlet reported.
The government alleged the couple engaged in a fraudulent tax refund scheme by paying a promoter for fraudulent tax paperwork, filing an amended 2014 tax return with a fabricated IRS Form 1099-MISC falsely claiming a mortgage company paid Hawver $749,163 in income and withheld $424,163, prompting the IRS to issue a $192,845 refund they were not entitled to, then moving the money through shell bank accounts and sending frivolous correspondence and filings to thwart collection, according to mauinow.com. The charges included conspiring to defraud the IRS, filing a false tax return, and money laundering, the outlet reported. IRS Criminal Investigation investigated the case.
A superseding indictment unsealed in the District of Idaho charged an Idaho man and woman and five non-Idaho residents with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, making false claims and money laundering, according to an official record. The record states that from 2023 through 2024, the conspirators allegedly prepared and submitted false individual and trust tax returns and fictitious financial instruments to the IRS, fraudulently claiming refunds totaling more than $57 million and receiving more than $8 million from the IRS. The record states that if convicted, the conspirators face a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for the conspiracy charge, with additional maximum penalties for other charges. An indictment is merely an allegation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
Sep 4, 2026, 4:26 p.m. ETFirst report
Seven Charged in $57M Tax Refund Fraud Scheme
Federal prosecutors unsealed a superseding indictment on September 3, 2026, charging seven people in connection with an alleged $57 million tax refund fraud scheme, according to the Department of Justice. The case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
The indictment charges Andrea and Kent Shannon of Kuna, Idaho, Monika Skinger of Chicago, Illinois, Sherita Chandler of Port St. Lucie, Florida, Saule Moshkanova of Roseville, California, Tiffany Nichols of Suwanee, Georgia, and Stacey Rice of Manteca, California, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. From 2023 through 2024, they allegedly prepared and submitted false tax returns and fictitious financial instruments to the IRS, claiming refunds totaling more than $57 million and receiving more than $8 million.
Andrea and Kent Shannon face additional charges of wire fraud, making false claims, and money laundering for allegedly using fraudulently obtained refunds to buy luxury cars. Moshkanova, Nichols, and Rice were each charged with one count of conspiracy; the others were previously charged. If convicted, the conspiracy charge carries up to 20 years in prison, with additional penalties for the other counts.
Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the National Fraud Enforcement Division said, “As alleged, this group of fraudsters participated in a $57 million tax fraud scheme, filing over 100 fictitious instruments and ultimately receiving more than $8 million in taxpayer dollars from the IRS.” IRS Criminal Investigation is investigating the case.
The charges in the indictment are merely allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. The case is ongoing, and no trial date has been set.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 02:49current
First published.
- Version 14 Sept 2026, 20:26current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 02:52current
First published.
- Version 111 Sept 2026, 02:44current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.