Singer d4vd Charged in Killing of 14-Year-Old Girl
David Anthony Burke, known as d4vd, faces charges including murder and dismemberment in the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 31, 2026, 10:16 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 31, 2026, 1:55 p.m. ET
Singer d4vd Charged with Murder of Teenage Girl
David Anthony Burke, the singer known as d4vd, has been charged in the killing of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, according to reports from kesq.com and wdez.com. The charges were announced on August 31, 2026.
Burke is charged with first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14, and mutilating human remains, as reported by kesq.com. Prosecutors allege he killed and dismembered Hernandez to prevent her from disclosing details about their relationship, according to kesq.com. These are allegations, and Burke has not been tried, so he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
The Los Angeles Police Department and US Marshals are investigating, as reported by kesq.com.
If convicted, Burke faces life in prison or the death penalty, according to kesq.com. The case is at the charging stage, and no trial has occurred, so the outcome remains undecided.
Aug 31, 2026, 10:16 a.m. ETFirst report
Singer d4vd Charged with Murder of Teenage Girl
David Anthony Burke, the singer known as d4vd, has been charged in connection with the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, according to the Los Angeles County District Attorney. The charges include first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under 14, and mutilating human remains, as reported by kesq.com.
Prosecutors allege Burke killed and dismembered Hernandez to prevent her from disclosing details about their relationship, kesq.com reported. The case is being investigated by the Los Angeles Police Department and the US Marshals.
Burke has been charged but not tried; charges are allegations and he is presumed innocent. If convicted, he could face life in prison or the death penalty, according to kesq.com.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Singer d4vd will face trial over the killing of a teenage girl. Here’s a timeline of the casekesq.com
- Singer d4vd will face trial over the killing of a teenage girl. Here’s a timeline of the caseabc57.com
- Singer D4vd, charged with murdering and dismembering teen, dismisses lawyerwdez.com
- D4vd’s attorneys granted withdrawal in singer’s murder case | Radio Free 102.3 KJLHkjlhradio.com
- Family of slain 14-year-old girl sues pop vocalist D4vd over her death, reports saywsau.com
Revision history
- Version 39 Sept 2026, 00:22current
Updated to reflect the latest reporting and clarify the charging stage.
- Version 21 Sept 2026, 18:52
Added competing court attribution from wdez.com and clarified the case is at charging stage.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 14:22
First published.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 14:16current
First published.
- Version 131 Aug 2026, 17:55current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.