Six Convicted or Plead Guilty in New Mexico Crude Oil Theft Conspiracy
Federal prosecutors announced that six men have been convicted or pleaded guilty for their roles in a scheme to steal crude oil from a New Mexico pipeline and sell it in Texas.
By AI ReporterWritten Aug 27, 2026, 4:10 p.m. ET
Developing · checked 1h ago
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 27, 2026, 4:38 p.m. ET — checked 1h ago.
ALBUQUERQUE – Six men have been or pleaded guilty for their roles in a conspiracy to steal crude oil from pipelines in New Mexico and transport it into Texas for resale, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Mexico. The announcement was made on August 27, 2026, by U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison and Special Agent in Charge Josiah Andrews of the Bureau of Land Management.
According to court records, from approximately March through August 2025, the defendants participated in a scheme to steal crude oil from a Plains All American Pipeline facility in New Mexico and transport it to a storage yard in Carlsbad, where the oil was transferred into Texas and sold. The stolen oil was valuable crude oil, rather than waste or "slop" oil, and the conspirators conducted thefts multiple times per week, often multiple times per day. The thefts resulted in the loss of thousands of barrels of crude oil and generated approximately $350,000 in proceeds.
Maxwell Jensen pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce. According to court records, Jensen orchestrated a scheme to purchase and resell stolen crude oil and directed sources of stolen oil to storage yards in Carlsbad, including the 7 Rivers facility operated by Hound Dog Energy. Businesses owned and operated by Jensen transferred approximately $195,750 to Hound Dog Energy between March 12 and April 23, 2025.
Thomas Rees pleaded guilty to conspiracy, conspiracy to launder money, interstate transportation of stolen property, and laundering of monetary instruments. Stolen oil was delivered to his Carlsbad facility, operated through his company, Hound Dog Energy, and then transferred to Texas for sale. Rees admitted that proceeds from the sale of stolen oil were deposited into Hound Dog Energy's business account and then transferred to another conspirator's business account to make the proceeds appear legitimate.
German Ortiz-Santillano, who worked for an oil company, pleaded guilty to misprision of a felony in concealing crimes of conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen property. Ortiz-Santillano admitted that he knew his co-conspirators were stealing oil from a pipeline without authorization and allowed them to do so. He admitted that he unlocked gates to provide access to the pipeline, concealed the thefts from other employees, and failed to report reductions in oil production and drops in pipeline pressure that he knew would alert others to the thefts.
Christopher Ortega was at trial of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce and interstate transportation of stolen property. At trial, prosecutors presented evidence that Ortega was hired to manage the Carlsbad yard, where he prepared load tickets documenting incoming and outgoing oil and witnessed the movement of stolen oil through the facility. Evidence also showed that the same vacuum truck repeatedly delivered stolen crude oil to the yard, where it was stored briefly before being transported into Texas for resale. Prosecutors presented evidence that Ortega knew the oil was stolen and understood that it was being transported across state lines.
Christian Jesus Contreras-Varela, a Mexican national, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, interstate transportation of stolen property, and being an alien in possession of a firearm. Obed Lopez pleaded guilty to conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen property. Lopez admitted that he participated in the conspiracy and coordinated with co-conspirators who worked on the pipeline. Lopez provided coordinates identifying where the conspirators should meet, while vacuum truck drivers connected to the pipeline and removed the crude oil. Lopez admitted that he knew the drivers did not have authority to take the oil and that the stolen oil was subsequently sold in Texas.
The case was investigated by special agents with the Bureau of Land Management and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James A. Dickens.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.