FirstAlerts

Springwater Man Charged with Public Lewdness at Ontario County Store

Jason Daniel Ward faces a charge of public lewdness after an alleged incident at a Runnings store; the case has not been decided.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 28, 2026, 5:16 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 28, 2026, 5:02 a.m. ETWritten Aug 28, 2026, 5:22 a.m. ET
Jason Daniel Ward, of Springwater, has been with public lewdness, according to the Ontario County Sheriff's Office as reported by FingerLakes1.com. The charge stems from an incident on Aug. 21 at the Runnings store, where Ward allegedly exposed his intimate parts in public. The case was investigated by Ontario County sheriff's deputies. Ward has been but the case has not been decided; charges are allegations and he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 28, 2026, 5:16 a.m. ETFirst report

    Springwater Man Charged with Public Lewdness at Ontario County Store

    Jason Daniel Ward, of Springwater, has been charged with public lewdness, according to fingerlakes1.com. The charge stems from an incident on Aug. 21 at a Runnings store in Ontario County, where Ward allegedly exposed his intimate parts in public. The Ontario County sheriff's deputies investigated the case. The matter is at the charging stage and has not been resolved; Ward is presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 128 Aug 2026, 09:22current

    First published.

  2. Version 128 Aug 2026, 09:16current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.