Stamford Woman Sentenced to More Than 12 Years for Drug and Gun Offenses
Amonda Mendez, 35, of Stamford, was sentenced to 150 months in prison for selling narcotics and a firearm while on federal supervised release.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 21, 2026, 12:52 p.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.
Earlier reports
Aug 21, 2026, 12:52 p.m. ETFirst report
Stamford Woman Sentenced to More Than 12 Years for Drug and Gun Offenses
A Stamford woman was sentenced to 150 months in prison and eight years of supervised release for selling narcotics and a firearm while on federal supervised release, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut.
Amonda Mendez, also known as "M-Dot" and "Dot," 35, was sentenced on August 20, 2026, by U.S. District Judge Vernon D. Oliver in Hartford. Court documents state that Mendez was previously sentenced in 2016 to 10 years in prison and four years of supervised release for narcotics trafficking and firearm possession. She was released from federal prison in January 2025.
Between April and July 2025, law enforcement made multiple controlled purchases of crack cocaine and fentanyl, and one purchase of a loaded .40 caliber pistol that had been reported stolen. Mendez was arrested on July 28, 2025. A search of her person revealed approximately 48 grams of crack cocaine and $1,934 in cash; a search of her Stamford residence revealed approximately 163 grams of crack; and a search of another Stamford residence connected to her revealed $2,456 in cash.
Mendez pleaded guilty on May 27, 2026, to possession with intent to distribute 28 grams or more of cocaine base. Judge Oliver sentenced her to 120 months for the narcotics offense and a consecutive 30 months for violating the conditions of her supervised release. The case was investigated by the DEA, ATF, and Stamford Police Department, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Kenneth L. Gresham. It is part of Operation Take Back America.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 16:52current
First published.
- Version 121 Aug 2026, 16:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.