FirstAlerts

Sudbury Man Sentenced to Four Years for $7.8 Million Embezzlement

Adam Gentile, 40, was sentenced in federal court for stealing from two medical practices where he worked as office manager.

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 2, 2026, 4:36 p.m. ET
Developing · not yet checked for updates

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

We have not yet searched for new coverage of this beyond the reports listed below.

A Sudbury man, formerly of Hudson, Massachusetts, was on Aug. 27, 2026, in federal court in Worcester for embezzling more than $7.8 million from two former employers, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts. The sentence was announced on Sept. 2, 2026. Adam Gentile, 40, was by U.S. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman to four years in prison and four years of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay restitution of $3.8 million and $3.3 million to the two victims, and forfeiture of $7.8 million. Gentile pleaded guilty in March 2026 to three counts of wire fraud after being charged in December 2025. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Gentile was hired as an administrative assistant at a medical practice near Boston around 2014 and was promoted to office manager, where he processed payroll. From about 2015 through November 2020, he embezzled more than $4.5 million by issuing himself extra paychecks, sometimes labeled as "bonuses," and by paying personal credit cards with the practice's account. In 2021, Gentile was hired as office manager at a second medical practice, where he again had sole payroll responsibility. From about April 2021 through May 2024, he executed a similar scheme, embezzling more than $3.3 million. He used the funds to pay personal credit cards, purchase and upgrade his home in Hudson, and invest in a side business. The announcement was made by U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley and FBI Special Agent in Charge Ted E. Docks. The Leominster Police Department provided assistance, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Kaitlin J. Brown prosecuted the case.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 12 Sept 2026, 20:36current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.