Three Nunda Residents Charged After Meth Found in Canandaigua Vehicle
Ontario County Sheriff's deputies charged three people after methamphetamine was found in a vehicle behind a Canandaigua store.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 7, 2026, 11:22 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 7, 2026, 11:52 p.m. ET
Three Nunda Residents Charged After Meth Found in Canandaigua Vehicle
Three Nunda residents face charges after deputies said they found methamphetamine in a vehicle behind Ollie's Bargain Outlet in the town of Canandaigua early Monday, Sept. 7, according to the Finger Lakes Times.
Bryan P. Hadsell, 47, Stephanie L. Dean, 36, and Jeremy P. Eastman, 40, were each charged with third-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell and endangering the welfare of a child, the newspaper reported.
The Ontario County Sheriff's Office made the arrests. The charges are only allegations at this stage, and the case has not been decided in court. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Sep 7, 2026, 11:22 p.m. ETFirst report
Three Charged After Meth Found in Canandaigua Vehicle
Three people were charged after deputies found methamphetamine in a vehicle behind Ollie's Bargain Outlet in the town of Canandaigua early Monday, Sept. 7, according to the Ontario County Sheriff's Office as reported by fingerlakes1.com.
Bryan P. Hadsell, 47, Stephanie L. Dean, 36, and Jeremy P. Eastman, 40, were each charged with third-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell and endangering the welfare of a child, fingerlakes1.com reported. The charges are allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The case is only at the charging stage and has not been resolved; the matter remains undecided.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 03:52current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 03:22current
First published.
- Version 18 Sept 2026, 04:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.